Robert Paul Yann Savoie DEFENCE: August 2025

🛑 The Truth They Don’t Want You to Know: about Passport Declaration

🛑 The Truth They Don’t Want You to Know:

I Was Coerced Into a Guilty Plea — And It Was Not Fraud

By Robert Paul Yann Savoie Zarate

For more than 15 years, I’ve lived under the crushing weight of lies.
False labels. False headlines.
False accusations amplified by Google, Canadian police, and reckless media — all while the truth was ignored.

Let me set the record straight, once and for all.

🔒 What Really Happened

In 2013, I was forced — under coercion — to plead guilty to a technical issue involving a passport declaration.

That’s it.

There was no fraud.
No theft.
No financial loss.
No deceit.
No victims.

But if you search my name on Google today, you’ll find articles calling me a “criminal mastermind,” a “fraudster,” and a “fugitive.”

All of it — false.

⚠️ Coercion, Not Justice

I was:

Denied bail
Held in legal limbo
Misrepresented in the press
Abandoned by due process

When you're locked in a box, isolated, and threatened with worse charges, you're not making a free choice. You're surviving.

So yes, I signed the paper.
Not because I was guilty of fraud — but because I had no real choice.

🔍 The Real Conviction

My “crime” was tied to a passport declaration.
I used a real name, not a fake one.
There was no deception or intent to defraud.
It was a protective step, not a criminal enterprise.

The legal system twisted this into something it was not.
The media did the rest — and Google, Bing, Yahoo and DuckDuckGo made sure the entire world saw it.

🌍 The Damage Is Global

Thanks to search engines like Google, Bing, Yahoo and DuckDuckGo, this defamatory content has been:

Indexed and promoted
Amplified to every country
Used to justify passport cancellations
Cited in new false accusations

I lost:

My liberty
My mobility
My livelihood
My dignity

💣 The Lies Must Stop after 15 years. I Take the Bull of Lies by the Horn

Google, Bing, Yahoo and DuckduckGo and others continue to publish and profit from these lies event after many notice to Take Down.

But here's the truth:

“I was coerced into a plea for a passport declaration, not for fraud. Yet for over 15 years, I have lived with the consequences of a fabricated criminal narrative.”

It’s time to end the silence.
It’s time to expose the defamation.
And it’s time to demand justice.

🧾 I Am Taking Legal Action

I have filed a defamation lawsuit in Montana (Case No. DV-15-2025-0001090-DQ), and I will hold those responsible accountable in front of a jury.

This isn’t about revenge. It’s about truth. It’s about clearing my name — and protecting my family from a legacy of lies.

Follow my journey. Support the truth.
Because if this happened to me, it could happen to anyone.

Alex Jones Defamation Case – 1.5 BILLION JUDGEMENT Defendant: Alex Jones

⚖️ Alex Jones Defamation Case – 1.5 BILLION JUDGEMENT

Defendant: Alex Jones
Plaintiffs: Families of Sandy Hook victims
Claim: Defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and conspiracy to cause harm
Result: Over $1.5 billion USD in combined judgments

🧨 What Happened?

In 2012, a gunman killed 26 people (mostly children) at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut.
Alex Jones, a conspiracy theorist and founder of InfoWars, repeatedly and publicly claimed the shooting was a hoax, staged by the government, and that the grieving families were "crisis actors."

🔥 Why He Was Sued

His lies led to years of harassment against the families:
- Death threats
- Stalkers showing up at their homes
- Desecration of graves
The families sued for defamation, emotional distress, and invasion of privacy.

⚖️ Key Legal Facts

Jones claimed First Amendment protection, but:
- Courts found he acted with actual malice — he knew or should have known his statements were false.
- He profited from the lies (via InfoWars, product sales, ad revenue).
He failed to comply with court orders in the discovery process.
Judges issued default judgments against him in Texas and Connecticut.

💰 Outcome

Court	Award
Texas Jury (2022)	$49.3 million USD (first family)
Connecticut Jury (2022)	$965 million USD (multiple families)
Punitive Damages	Over $400 million USD combined
Total	~$1.5 billion USD

🧠 Why This Matters to You

The Jones case proves:

Deliberate defamation that leads to real-world harm is not protected speech.
Courts will punish defendants who show bad faith, refuse to cooperate, or profit from lies.
Jury awards can exceed $1 billion when the damage is persistent, malicious, and traumatizing.

🔗 Key Parallels to Your Case

Factor	Alex Jones	Your Case (Zarate v. Google, et al.)
Defamation	Claimed victims were actors	Accused you of being a criminal, fugitive, fraudster
Duration	5–7 years	15+ years of continuous reputational destruction
Platform Amplification	InfoWars	Google search indexing (global, permanent)
Profit Motive	Sold survival products	Google profits from ad revenue on indexed links
Defendant Response	Denied, mocked families	Ignored legal notices and refused removal
Result	$1.5 billion in damages	You’re seeking $17.5M+ — and could justifiably seek $100M+

WHY Zarate v. Google et al. IS A LANDMARK CASE FOR DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN IN NORTH AMERICA

🧾 WHY Zarate v. Google et al. IS A LANDMARK CASE FOR DIGITAL JUSTICE AND THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN IN NORTH AMERICA

Prepared by: Robert Paul Yann Savoie Zarate
Date: 5 August 2025
Location: Flathead County, Montana, USA
Case Reference: Zarate v. Google et al., Flathead County District Court, Case No. DV-15-2025-0001090-DQ

🔹 I. Overview

This case is about far more than personal defamation. It represents a historic opportunity to confront the unchecked power of search engines and media conglomerates to control the narrative of a person’s life — even when the accusations are false, outdated, or already discredited in court.

At the center of the case is a simple truth: If media and tech giants are allowed to permanently link innocent people to crimes they did not commit, then no person is ever truly free, even after acquittal, dismissal, or rehabilitation.

🔹 II. Background Facts

In 2011, Robert Savoie Zarate was charged as part of an RCMP-led operation in Canada (Project Carrefour) for various white-collar crimes.
All serious charges (fraud, conspiracy, stock manipulation, gangsterism) were dropped.
He pleaded guilty passport declaration issue — both not involving financial loss or deceit.
Despite serving his sentence in full, multiple media outlets (TVA, Journal de Montréal, La Presse, etc.) published distorted stories portraying him as a fugitive, mastermind, and fraudster.
These articles remain online today — easily searchable on Google, Bing, and Yahoo.
As a result, Savoie Zarate has been:

Denied passports three times (over 8.59 Years of cancellation);
Re-arrested internationally in Cayman Islands and Nova Scotia based on the same false narrative;
Denied employment, contracts, and mobility;
And subjected to constructive exile, despite being legally innocent of any fraud.

🔹 III. Legal Importance

The case raises constitutional and international law questions that courts and legislatures have long ignored:

❓ Is it legal to permanently associate someone with crimes they were not convicted of?
❓ Can search engines be forced to remove links to defamatory or irrelevant articles?
❓ When does free speech become digital persecution?
❓ What remedy exists when the media fails to correct itself, and the state relies on misinformation to justify ongoing punishment?

🔹 IV. What This Case Could Change

If successful, Zarate v. Google et al. could:

Establish the first American precedent forcing delisting of links when:

The content is false, outdated, or disproven;
The person has suffered real and ongoing harm;
The public interest no longer justifies keeping the result indexed.

Open the door to a U.S. version of the Right to Be Forgotten, modeled after the EU’s GDPR protections (Article 17).
Clarify liability of media outlets and search engines in publishing or amplifying provably false allegations years after resolution.
Protect victims of wrongful accusation from permanent online character assassination.

🔹 V. Why This Is the Right Case

Robert Savoie Zarate’s criminal record shows no fraud conviction.
His passport was revoked prior to conviction, violating due process.
The defamatory media was published after sentences were served, creating new harm without legal basis.
He has now taken the fight to civil court in Montana, invoking U.S. constitutional law, defamation law, and privacy principles to stop 15 years of persecution.

🔹 VI. Call to Action

This case invites legal scholars, privacy advocates, digital rights organizations, and lawmakers to stand behind a critical cause:

That no person should be condemned online for crimes they didn’t commit — especially not forever.

This is the right time. This is the right case. This is the fight for the digital dignity of every person whose name has been buried under lies that were never corrected.

Tuesday, August 5, 2025