WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE ALLEGED FALSE PRETENCE? WHO IS THE REAL VICTIM?

 PAUL DRYSDALE

Crown Counsel
Public Prosecution Service of Nova Scotia

RE: PROVINCIAL COURT FILE NO. 8519093

WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE ALLEGED FALSE PRETENCE?

Mr. Drysdale,

I write once again regarding Provincial Court File No. 8519093.

Nearly eight years have now passed since the August 25, 2018 Jeep transaction.

Despite years of proceedings, disclosure requests, motions, litigation, passport consequences, and substantial prejudice, the fundamental question remains unanswered:

WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE ALLEGED FALSE PRETENCE?

To this day, I have never received a clear explanation identifying:

• the precise false representation allegedly made;

• the person to whom it was allegedly made;

• the person who allegedly relied upon it;

• the specific financial loss caused by that alleged representation;

• the evidence establishing each essential element of the offence.

Instead, the record reveals numerous inconsistencies and significant exculpatory evidence that appears to have been ignored.

One of the most troubling examples concerns the second Jeep located in Sherbrooke.

As early as October 6, 2020, an opposition to seizure before judgment was filed in Court of Québec File No. 500-22-263082-201 concerning Jeep Wrangler JL VIN 1C4HJXEGXLW140329.

That court filing specifically alleged that:

• the July 17, 2020 payment of $1,089.52 had been made;

• the August 17, 2020 payment of $1,089.52 had been made;

• all payments due under the financing agreement had been paid;

• the account was current when the vehicle was seized on September 18, 2020;

• there was no payment default at the time of seizure.

The filing further alleged that the seizure was based upon inaccurate and misleading information supplied by Jean Sebastien Perreault during the lender's investigation.

These allegations were not invented years later. They were raised immediately in 2020, only weeks after the seizure occurred.

The Sherbrooke Jeep was not exported from Canada.

It was not dismantled.

It was not hidden.

It was not sold through criminal channels.

It remained fully identifiable and recoverable.

The account was being serviced and payments were being made.

These facts are difficult to reconcile with any allegation that I was engaged in a scheme to obtain vehicles without payment.

I remain deeply concerned by the role played by information supplied by Jean-Sébastien Perreault of Scotiabank.

Throughout multiple proceedings, serious concerns have been raised regarding the accuracy of statements attributed to Mr. Perreault, including allegations concerning addresses, telephone numbers, Air Bermuda Inc., identity issues, and other matters that remain highly disputed.

The October 6, 2020 filing specifically challenged allegations that Air Bermuda did not exist, challenged allegations concerning telephone numbers allegedly provided on credit applications, and challenged allegations concerning identity and address issues.

Those concerns have never been adequately addressed.

At the same time, there remains uncertainty regarding the alleged loss itself.

Amherst Chrysler ultimately recovered the original Jeep of 2018.

The vehicle was subsequently resold.

The actual financial impact remains unclear.

I have repeatedly requested clarification regarding the alleged victim and the alleged loss relied upon to justify the prosecution. Who is the Victim?

To date, those questions remain unanswered.

The procedural history of this matter is equally troubling.

The events date back to August 2018.

The prosecution was commenced years later. 3 years later?

Disclosure was significantly delayed. 520 Days. Only that exceed the 18 Month Jordan Limit on Crown Fault

Numerous motions were filed.

Video appearance requests were denied by Judge Rosalind Michie. Whit no written reason

Jordan concerns have repeatedly been raised. IGNORE

The matter now extends far beyond what would normally be expected for a straightforward allegation involving a single personal vehicle transaction.

Recent media reports have highlighted cases involving dozens (94 Cars) of stolen vehicles and millions of dollars in losses.

My case does not involve a criminal organization.

My case does not involve vehicle exportation.

My case does not involve a theft ring.

My case does not involve dozens of vehicles.

My case concerns a single personal Jeep transaction.

The existence of ongoing payments on the Sherbrooke Jeep, the recovery and resale of the original Jeep, the unresolved questions concerning the alleged victim and loss, and the extraordinary passage of time all raise serious concerns regarding both the strength of the prosecution and the continued public interest in pursuing it.

Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Crown conduct a fresh and independent review of this file.

After nearly eight years, I respectfully submit that the interests of justice require a clear answer to a simple question:

WHAT EXACTLY WAS THE ALLEGED FALSE PRETENCE?

I remain willing to discuss a fair and practical resolution of this matter.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert saavoie

5005 Dalhousie Drive NW, Unit 175 #1500
Calgary, Alberta T3A 5R8
robert.robert.ltd@gmail.com 403-800-0108